• 1/22/21. Article/link cleanup.

Hi friend and Welcome aboard!

Before we dive into the Shure SM7B vs. SM58 comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because..

You’ve come to the right place!!

What I will bring you in this review

Because I have discussed these mics before, I will quickly outline the similarities & differences and then point you to some separate reviews of each.

  1. Introduction
  2. Similarities & Differences
  3. Final Word

Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!


Both of these mics have a long history. The SM58 came out in 1966, just a year after the SM57. The original SM7 came out in 1976, and was perhaps most famously used by Michael Jackson on his best selling album “Thriller.” Shure SM7 vs. SM7B.

Some more info on the history of the SM7 & SM7B: THE HISTORY AND THE FACTS.

The SM58 is renowned for its on-stage prowess, specifically for vocals. The SM7B is a dynamic mic more suited for in-studio as a vocal and broadcasting microphone primarily.

Similarities & Differences


  • Both are dynamic microphones. Condenser Mic vs. Dynamic Mic.
  • Some people say that the SM58 and Sm7B share the same capsule, or at the very least sound so similar that it’s a wash. What is a cardioid capsule?  Also, check out this thread on Gearslutz for a discussion on the subject.
  • Both benefit from a good preamp.
  • Both mics are based on the Unidyne III cartridge.


  • The SM58 is more suited for live vocals, while the SM7B does better in the studio. Home Studio Corner did a great article comparing the two in-studio however. Check it out!
  • You will need at least 60db of gain with the SM7B. Most entry-level audio interfaces don’t provide enough gain. For instance, my Scarlett 2i2 only provides between 48-50. So you with the SM7B, you will either need to purchase a preamp or use an audio interface in conjunction with the cloud lifter. I go more in-depth on that in the SM7B review (link at the bottom).
  • The SM7B has a mid boost and a low cut filter, while the SM58 has no onboard features.
  • The SM7B has a cleaner low end, with less rumble. It also has a smoother top end.
  • The SM7B is harder to store because it’s so large. It’s the type of mic that you will want to put somewhere and leave it. The Sm58 is a lot more portable.
  • Overall the SM7B sounds a lot clearer than the SM58, with a smoother low end. There’s simply more clarity with it. The SM58 by contrast is a little boomier in the low end.
  • Frequency response. The SM58’s is 50Hz – 15,000 kHz, while the SM7B’s is 50Hz – 20,000 kHz.

Final Word

I will try and make this as simple as possible because I hate being confused myself!

Shure SM58:

Sounds good with the ball and standard windscreen, though a bit boomy. Clarity isn’t quite there. Here’s a video showing the difference.

Shure SM58:

Sounds a lot better without the ball (unscrewed), with a windscreen or pop-filter. Definitely holds its own to the SM7B in this case, but still not quite the same.

Home Studio Corner’s article on the 58 vs. SM7B


Sounds remarkably similar to the SM7B with the A81WS windscreen. It’s pretty scary actually. Check it out! Note: the reviewer in the video is using an Apogee Duet preamp. Preamp vs. Interface.

So in a nutshell what do I recommend?

I’m going to have to say between the SM58 and SM7B, I would still go with the SM7B. Interested in learning more about this beast? Check out:


Between the SM57 and SM7B? Wow, that’s tough, but if you’re on a budget, how could you go wrong with the SM57 + A81WS (windscreen)? You can’t.





Well, that’s about it for today my friend! I hope you’ve enjoyed this brief article on the Shure SM7B vs. SM58.

Questions? Comments? Requests? Did I miss the mark on something? Please let me know down below or Contact me!!

Which of these are you more likely to go with? I would love to hear from you. Until next time…

All the best and God bless,





Be sure to check out my Reviews and Resources page for more helpful and informative articles!


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *