The Magnificently Open AKG K553 Closed Back Headphones

G’day mate and Welcome aboard!!

Before we get into the AKG K553 Review, grab a snack, sit back and relax because..

You’ve come to the right place!!

What I will bring you in this review

  1. Ratings/Price
  2. Specifications
  3. Summary
  4. Pros
  5. Cons
  6. Video Review
  7. Amp/DAC requirements
  8. Who these headphones benefit?
  9. Consensus/Conclusion
  10. Final Word

Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!

AKG K553

Ratings/Price

Specifications

  • Type: Closed back.
  • Fit: Circumaural (Around the Ear).
  • Impedance: 32 Ohm. What is Headphone Impedance?
  • Sensitivity: 114dB/mW. What is Sensitivity in Headphones?
  • Driver size: 50mm. What is a headphone driver?
  • Frequency response: 12Hz – 28kHz.
  • Material: Replaceable leatherette with slow retention foam, plastic, brushed aluminum.
  • Cable detachable: No.
  • Pads replaceable: Yes.
  • Connector: Screw-on jack combo (1/4″ and 1/8″), gold plated.
  • Color: Black.
  • Weight: 10.75 oz.

Summary

The closed back AKG K553 is a perfect example of a balanced headphone. The bass is just right, the treble is crispy but not sibilant, and the mid-range is nearly perfect. Closed back vs. open back headphones.

Think of a smooth, buttery, transparent, but lively sound signature that reveals much detail, but never becomes overbearing. That’s the K553 in a nutshell. In fact, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that in my opinion, this is the closed back version of the Philips SHP9500. The sound signatures are so similar that I can’t help but compare them. They both also have 50mm drivers which might contribute to this as well.

The crazy thing is that the 9500 is dirt cheap in comparison to the K553. However, if you’re looking for a closed back in this range, you can’t go wrong with this puppy. For an entry level closed back mixing/mastering/reference headphone, I would go with the magnificent Sony MDR V6. Learn more: Sony MDR V6 Review!

That said, it’s not to take away from the K553, as it’s a bit of a step up from the aforementioned models.

Build

Build wise, these are excellent. They are made of brushed aluminum, plastic, and pleather, and don’t feel cheap in the slightest. They are relatively lightweight, but feel extremely solid and hefty enough to deter any doubts that you spent your money well.

Comfort

Comfort is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, they sit very well on your dome, but you may have trouble getting a good seal. This is one of the biggest issues that users face. I myself had the same issue when demoing them inside Guitar Center. Once you get a good fit, it’s smooth sailing. It’s just achieving the seal that takes a bit of elbow grease.

Other than that, these are extremely comfortable and can be worn for long periods without a rest.

Pros

  • Clean bass response. No bloat here folks!
  • Accurate mid-range with a phenomenal Timbre. What is Timbre?
  • Crispy treble.
  • Good noise isolation.
  • Good Soundstage. What is Soundstage?
  • Excellent instrument separation and overall clarity.

Cons

  • Achieving a good seal is a bit of a challenge.
  • Headband needs more padding.

Video Review!

Coming soon!

Amp/DAC requirements

You won’t need a head amp with these because of their high sensitivity and low impedance. How to choose a headphone amp!

However, depending on how good or bad your DAC is, you may invest in one. Learn more about this in the link above (How to choose a headphone amp).

If you decide on an amp:

These should all be on your radar. 🙂

Who these headphones benefit?

Endorsed for:

  • Mixing
  • Mastering
  • Reference
  • Hip-Hop
  • Rap
  • EDM
  • Pop
  • Indie
  • Rock
  • Metal
  • Gaming
  • Jazz
  • Classical

I think they do well with nearly all genres, as they are extremely balanced but still sound rather lively. That said, your mileage may vary. I prefer my bass to be on the lighter side, because it tends to reveal the sound better and gives instruments and voices more room to breathe.

Thoughts from Stu’s notepad

  • You may opt to replace the padding, as they are quite shallow and may not work for everyone. The Brainwavz HM5’s are a good option.
  • You may have an issue with the lack of headband padding.
  • The lack of a detachable cable may bother you.
  • The giant “R” and “L” on the insides of the ear-cups are extremely helpful in determining how to put them on correctly. A good feature considering basically no headphones do this (the 9500 is an exception, but theirs are on the outside of the ear-cup in large letters).
  • There’s a bit of a harsh character between 1-2kHz that can sound a bit grating. Not quite a Con, but keep it in mind. You can always EQ it down a few decibels if need be.

Consensus/Conclusion

The AKG K553 is an excellent improvement over the original 550 and 551, with an improved mid-range, phenomenal bass, and crisp treble. Comfort will vary from person to person, and a good seal is a must before listening to any music. Build is superb as well, and overall these provide good Soundstage despite being closed back.

Final Word

I think this is an excellent upgrade from a headphone like the Audio Technica ATH M50x, and proves to be a viable solution to your studio reference needs.

Entry level studio closed back:

CHECK OUT MY OFFICIAL SONY MDR V6 REVIEW!!

Upgrade:

SEE THE K553 FOR YOURSELF ON AMAZON!!


Well that’s about it for today folks! I hope you’ve enjoyed this AKG K553 Review.

What do you think about them?? The V6? The 9500? Let me know!!

Questions? Comments? Requests? Did I miss the mark on something? Let me know in the comments below or Contact me!! I would love to hear from you..

Until then, all the best and God bless..

 

 

-Stu

[Xtr@Ba$eHitZ]

Can’t decide which headphones to purchase? Interested in a complete buyers guide outlining over 40 of the best options on the market? Click on over to the best audiophile headphones to learn more!!

Be sure to also check out my Reviews and Resources page for more helpful and informative articles!

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *