Is this yet another audio scam designed to trick people into buying sh** they don’t need?
All of these answers and more, comin’ up!!
Greetings bass head, Stuart Charles here, HomeStudioBasics.com helping YOU make sound decisions leading to a beautiful audio experience that will make you fall in love with music, all over again, so…
Asynchronous USB is found in DACS that utilize their own internal master clock to pull data from your PC (in accordance with the DAC’S own timing) in the digital form of 1’s and 0’s. That data is then converted to analog and sent to your ears distortion-free, theoretically. Related:Beginners Guide: What is a USB DAC?
Don’t forget to leave me some love! <3
This clock drives the converter directly, and does not rely on, nor is it synchronized with any of the PC’s internal clocks.
Further to this, are the benefits of using asynchronous USB audio. A computer and a USB DAC both have their own internal clock which dictates the timing for both devices. One of the problems with USB audio transfer is that these clocks are not running at the same time. Digital music is sent as USB packets from the computer down the USB cable to the DAC. These are sent in periodic time frames according to the computer’s clock.Cambridge Audio
The timing errors essentially cause what’s known as Jitter, leading to distortion of the audio.
Synchronous vs. Asynchronous vs. Adaptive
In a Synchronous USB DAC, the computer pushes data through to the DAC and dictates the timing of the packets sent. Not ideal.
In an Adaptive USB DAC, the internal clock of the DAC is being adjusted every millisecond to match the flow of data. Not exactly ideal either, and can also result in Jitter even though it’s technically better than a Synchronous transfer.
With Asynchronous, the data is requested by the DAC in harmony with its own internal clock, thus reducing Jitter as much as possible and providing you the listener with the best experience, distortion-free.
Do I personally believe Asynchronous is better?
I can’t really say one way or the other, but I’m leaning towards yes.
Yeah, that’s right you heard me correctly!
Most of my regular readers and followers by now know my zero-tolerance policy for snake oil in this hobby. Asynchronous USB is something I’m still not quite sold on one way or another.
When I demoed the CEntrance DACport HD back in February of 2020, it did stand out a tad more in terms of sound, but I really can’t be sure if it being Asynchronous was the kicker because I don’t know exactly which DACS utilize Synchronously and which don’t.
That’s a whole separate can of demo worms for another day.
I will say that the DragonFly Red is one such Asynchronous DAC, and I do tend to recommend it a lot more often than some of the others I’ve had experience with.
The DACport is also an Asynchronous USB DAC, and it did seem smoother and more fluid sounding as well. But that could have completely been my imagination. There are dozens of DACs I’ve demoed that all sound fantastic, fluid, etc.
The real question is: Will you actually be able to discern Jitter going on in real-time?
I have never once complained about a DAC delivering to my ears the music in a less than satisfactory way.
As it stands now, I honestly don’t think most people would even be able to tell.
I’ve demoed the DragonFly Red against countless DACS. It does tend to sound more open, crisp, and grand. The portrayal of Soundstage with it is definitely better than many of the others.
The Chord Mojo is another example, and still is the best DAC I’ve personally heard, right alongside the Bryston BHA-1 (Not Asynchronous AFAIK, but I can’t find a definitive answer).
I’ve talked about these 2 countless times in articles and videos.
In this case of the DragonFlies, DACport, and Mojo
Can we boil down their superior performance to a lack of jitter?
I don’t know the answer to that question definitively. I’m just giving you some food for thought. It may very well be the determining factor, and why I’m always recommending both the Mojo and DF Red to people from a purely sound standpoint. They both perform really, really well.
The NAIM DAC-V1 is another example of a product that stands out to me. It’s incredibly neutral and crisp sounding if a bit too sterile at times. Still, it’s one of the best performers that I’ve personally tried, and it’s also an Asynchronous DAC.
Perhaps there’s something to it.
Still, I think the way a DAC sounds mostly comes down to its DAC chip, but more importantly the output impedance. What is Output Impedance?
People will argue with you all day on this sort of stuff, but I’m a firm believer that the way the track itself sounds has way more to do with how it was recorded, mixed, and mastered rather than all the other extra fluff that ends up causing wannabe audiophiles to go into a rage.
These are basic principles of sound engineering and will never change, no matter what some Reddit snob with too much time on his hands says.
Asynchronous may very well be the way to go when shopping for DACS, but it’s hard to say one way or another.
I will update this article as new information comes to light. I have demoed close to 50 Amps & DACS at the time of this post, and it will be interesting to find out which of those (outside of the ones mentioned above), utilize Asynchronous and which do not.
Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in an crowded industry.