Home Microphone Comparisons Beta 87a vs. Beta 58 | LIVE OR STUDIO?
>AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.<

Don't forget to share if you found it helpful!

Hello there friend and Welcome aboard!!

Before we get into the Shure SM58 vs. SM58S, grab a snack (or a tic-tac), sit back, and relax because…

You’ve come to the right place!!

What I will bring you in this review

Today I will provide a quick comparison of these two, and then give a recommendation towards the end! 🙂

  1. Similarities & Differences
  2. Final Word

Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!!

Similarities & Differences


  • Polar pattern. Both are super-cardioid. What is a Cardioid capsule? This basically means that both have a smaller, more restrictive area that you can effectively sing into. The advantage is that it rejects sound from the sides better, but the downside is that you have to be pretty much directly in front of it to get the clearest frequency.
  • Both have internal shock-mounts.


  • Presence. The Shure Beta 87A has more output and a bit more presence in the upper mid-range going into the treble. This is because of its pattern presence boost. Just keep in mind the peak does roll off pretty quickly. Also remember that if the singer in question has a softer voice, or tends to sing further away from the mic, the 87A may not work quite as well.
  • Phantom power. The 87A requires phantom power via your audio interface, a mixer, or something similar. What does an audio mixer do? So in essence, an 87A is a condenser microphone while the Beta 58 is dynamic. Condenser mic vs. Dynamic mic.
  • Frequency response. Further, the Beta 58 has a frequency response of 50Hz – 16kHz, while the Beta 87A has a 50Hz – 20kHz frequency response. So the 87A as mentioned has a bit more sparkle in the treble regions and sounds brighter and airier overall. The Beta 58 is warmer by contrast. Warmer simply means more relaxed, lusher, etc.
  • Sensitivity. The 87A is more prone to feedback than the Beta 58. This means it’s not quite as good in a live setting. The Beta 58 does do well live and does better at rejecting feedback. It’s not quite as sensitive though, and you may miss out on some clarity. So basically, if you’re on stage in a very loud setting, the 87A will not work well and you should avoid it. The Beta 58 would be your go-to in that situation, as you can scream into it more effectively. Heh. That said, the 87A is more of a studio mic, as it will provide more detail, clarity, presence, and an overall more intimate sound signature.
  • Space. All that said, if you have plenty of space on stage, and a good PA, you could get away with using an 87A as it will sound better. Just make sure that if you’re cramped or tight, use a Beta 58.

Final Word

In a nutshell:

Live work, loud voices, screaming, loud stage, don’t need phantom power, etc. = Beta 58.


Studio work, softer voices, jazz, singing farther away, more detail, truer/more accurate sound, need phantom power in-studio, etc. = Beta 87A.


Well, that’s about it for today my friend! I hope you’ve enjoyed this Beta 87a vs. Beta 58 comparison.

Questions? Comments? Requests? Did I miss the mark on something? Please let me know down below or Contact me!!

What do you think about these? Are they worth a try? I would love to hear from you. Until next time…

All the best and God bless,





Be sure to also check out my Reviews and Resources page for more helpful and informative articles!

Don't forget to share if you found it helpful!

You may also like

Leave a Comment